From: "Clifford Lynch" Sender: To: CNI-ANNOUNCE Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 11:50:00 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [192.100.21.233] (HELO [192.100.21.30]) by cni.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.9) with ESMTPS id 24871106 for cni-announce@cni.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 11:40:24 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Message-Id: X-Original-Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 08:38:11 -0700 X-Original-To: cni-announce@cni.org Subject: Research Data Management & the History of Science Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" There's an interesting report from the History of Science Society that looks at the question of how historians of science, as opposed to scientists in various disciplines, need to be represented in efforts to make decisions about the curation and retention of research data, using the context of the recent US Federal government efforts to open up government-produced and government-funded research data. This is an important topic that has had very little in-depth investigation to date, as far as I am aware. The report is at: http://www.hssonline.org/publications/Newsletter2013/October-data-management My thanks to Joyce Ogburn at Appalachian State University for bringing this report to my attention. Clifford Lynch Director, CNI