From: "Clifford Lynch" Sender: To: CNI-ANNOUNCE Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:40:00 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [192.100.21.30] (HELO [10.142.1.86]) by cni.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.9) with ESMTPS id 25724062 for cni-announce@cni.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:32:29 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Message-Id: X-Original-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:09:55 -0800 X-Original-To: cni-announce@cni.org Subject: NSDA Report on Implications of New PDF/A-3 Standard Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" I wanted to share the announcement of a new report from the National Digital Stewardship Alliance on the PDF/A-3 file format specification that was released in late 2012. The PDF/A specifications are fairly widely used to define a "more preservable" subset of the hugely complex general PDF specification (A is for "archival"). The new "incremental" upgrade to PDF/A raises some very nasty issues for institutions relying on this specification in an archival context; at the very least, migration to this new version is going to take some careful consideration, and potentially some substantial expense and disruption. There's a helpful short overview on the Library of Congress Digital Preservation blog at: http://blogs.loc.gov/digitalpreservation/2014/02/new-ndsa-report-the-benefits-and-risks-of-the-pdfa-3-file-format-for-archival-institutions/ The full report is at http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/ndsa/working_groups/documents/NDSA_PDF_A3_report_final022014.pdf Many thanks to NDSA for alerting the community to this serious potential problem, and for a good analysis of the issues involved. Clifford Lynch