From: "Cliff Lynch cliff@cni.org" Sender: To: CNI-ANNOUNCE Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:23:01 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [73.193.181.76] (account clifford@cni.org HELO [192.168.1.15]) by cni.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.7) with ESMTPSA id 37243594 for cni-announce@cni.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:07:07 -0400 X-Original-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:07:30 -0400 X-Original-To: cni-announce@cni.org X-Original-Message-ID: <20201026130730975250.85e142c5@cni.org> Subject: Ithaka report on Impact of COVID-19 on the Research Enterprise MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.6.3 Today, Jane Radecki and Roger Schoenfeld of Ithaka S+R released a very inte= resting and wide-ranging study of the Impact of COVID-19 on the Research En= terprise. I've reproduced the Executive Summary below. This report echos ma= ny themes that we heard at our recent Executive Roundtables on Research Res= tart and Research Continuity (see https://www.cni.org/go/research-continuit= y-sept-2020-update) and goes into issues around funding and federal grants = in depth. The report can be read online or downloaded as a PDF at: https://sr.ithaka.org/publications/the-impacts-of-covid-19-on-the-research-= enterprise/ Ithaka will discuss aspects of this work at the Fall CNI member meeting=20 My thanks to Ithaka for helping us to better understand these developments. Clifford Lynch Director, CNI --------------------- =46rom the Ithaka report: The COVID-19 pandemic and associated disruptions have had a major impact on= the US academic research enterprise. This report provides a landscape revi= ew of what is known about these impacts, from March through mid-October 202= 0, with an aim of identifying gaps that should be addressed. Our focus is o= n externally funded research, and therefore we emphasize STEM fields almost= exclusively. As a result, we also focus on the largest research universiti= es, which conduct an outsized share of this research and which are themselv= es quite reliant on the intellectual activity and revenues associated with = it. Our key findings include: =09=95=09The federal government provided substantial flexibility to univers= ities in utilizing research funding at the beginning of the pandemic. In ad= dition, there is little reason to anticipate substantial budget reductions = among most major research funders. As a result of these factors, while univ= ersities face substantial declines to some revenue sources and risks to mos= t others, externally funded scientific research is likely to be relatively = stable. That said, the ways in which the academic research enterprise is in= terwoven with, and in some cases cross-subsidized by, instructional activit= ies pose some risk to research support. There are substantial unanswered qu= estions about how negative impacts to the business models of research unive= rsities will affect scientific research. =09=95=09Many traditional research activities were largely suspended in the= spring into summer, other than COVID-19-related and other essential resear= ch. With federal flexibilities ending, universities scrambled to put in pla= ce necessary protections to allow laboratories and other research groups to= safely resume their activities. Many but not all research activities have = successfully restarted, even if not all are at full capacity. In parallel, = the COVID-19 emergency led to substantial innovation in research collaborat= ion and scholarly communication. It also demonstrated the limits of collabo= ration and communication infrastructure and services in the face of widespr= ead attention to scientific progress and its politicization. There are subs= tantial unanswered questions about the resiliency of the research enterpris= e and the permanence of the many adaptations to collaboration and scholarly= communication that we have seen. =09=95=09The human impacts of the disruptions are vast. These include limit= ations and impediments facing international students and disruptions to res= earchers that differ by gender, caregiver status, and career level. There a= re substantial unanswered questions about international talent flows, the d= evelopment of early career researchers, and setbacks in achieving gender eq= uity. As we write, the research enterprise is coming back to life after an unplan= ned and unprecedented stoppage. Given the uncertain nature of how the pande= mic will proceed and what societal, economic, and educational changes will = result, we expect other impacts to develop over the coming months and years= .