I'm cross-posting this meeting announcement from the SPARC
mailing list, as I think that it may be of interest to some
CNI-announce readers that would not otherwise see it. It addresses
some very interesting questions about how we should identify works
that are part of the public domain.
Government Information Managers, CIOs, Librarians, Government IP
Attorneys, Government Editors, Publishers and Web Managers, Public
Affairs Managers
REGISTRATION:
Register by October 23, 2006
http://cendievents.infointl.com/gimws2006
There is no registration fee; however, you must register for entry
into the GPO building. U.S. Government employees should bring
their Government I.D.s. Non-U.S. Government employees must have
a valid picture I.D. such as a Drivers License.
The registration site also includes a preliminary program and
directions
BACKGROUND: Government works are defined under Title 17 USC Sec 101 as
"prepared by an officer or employee of theUnited States
government as part of that person's official duties." Government
agencies on their web sites usually advise users that information on
the site is not copyrighted unless otherwise stated, and that absent a
notice, the information may be distributed or copied. Prior to joining
the Berne Convention in 1989, it was reasonable and practical for the
government not to give notice or mark government works. Post-Berne,
this practice leads to confusion and uncertainty. When the work is
separated from its originating source, you're forced to guess. Under
the old law, the burden was on the copyright holder to give notice or
else forfeit copyright protection. Now that a notice is optional and
automatically "vests in original works of authorship," the
burden is on users. Absent a copyright notice, users must assume the
work is copyrighted, investigate its status and seek permission if
their intended use is beyond the allowed exemptions.
A government mark would serve as Copyright Management Information
(CMI), defined under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) as
identifying information about a work, author, copyright owner (or not)
as well as terms and conditions for use of the work.
This question of marking government works is of immediate interest
since the Federal Research Public Access Bill (Cronyn-Lieberman) has,
as one of its provisions, the requirement that works by Federal
employees "be marked as being public domain material when
published." Whether the bill ever passes, agencies may
choose to implement some or all of the provisions, following the lead
of the National Institutes of Health.